Open Source vs Traditional Development Essays -- Essays Papers

outdoors Source vs Traditional phylogenyIn the world of applied science nowadays there is room for every single at every take of expertise. From our identified Gurus, to the near bought their first electronic electronic computer newbie. post computers are sometimes almost to easygoing to use. The old saying nevertheless enough rope to hang yourself comes to mind. Settings that diversify the very way the brass looks, and runs can be changed with the simple infiltrate of the mouse. This power, which has been given to every level of user, is non from training, but from improvements and advancements in the musical arrangement, and act computer software program system on the computer. This software is in a constant domain of development, improving on authoritative features and adding new ones.Out of this regular and logical update in technology have grown many theories and Ideas on how software should be actual and tellled. From corporate America, to colleg e campuses everyone has an idea from one fundamental to the former(a). On one spatial relation the belief all software should be free and open to all, and the other valueing software secrets like a rabid guard dog. Of course, some(prenominal) sides believe the other is a fanatic with a exhaust omit of sense. The real dividing line is not really the control and distribution of the software itself, but the blueprint or mention work out that creates it. That source code is the human take awayable text that defines what the software does, and looks like. From that a compiler converts it to a form used by the computer know as simple machine code. In this compiled format it appears to be complete garbage to the average person, even so to most people considered to be computer professionals or gurus. Most software--at to the lowest degree on the traditional side--is distributed in its compiled form. The master copy intent of compiling was not to protect the source co de, but this has been one benefit to the software developers. Since a computer can not read the source code, a program is complied to allow it to run on same type of hardware without the fate of special software to interpret it into machine code.The traditional and most uncouth form of source code control at once uses copyrights and the judicial system to protect it. Companies like Microsoft vigilantly protect their vital copyrighted assets by utilizing the court systems any time it feels a threat from an outside source. An understudy form of source code co... ...continue to continue the OSS movement it will in itself create an industry with more(prenominal) competition, a higher level of standards, and more consumer prime(prenominal). Closed software has proven to stuffy the market and allow it to be controlled by a single monopoly. The noncompetitive technology environment of today has created bloated applications and a complete void of choice for consumers. Biblio graphyStallman, Richard (1998), Linux and the GNU Project. In give up Software Foundation On-Line. Avaialble http//www.fsf.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html Cooper, Charles (Friday, November 5, 1999), Microsoft judged a monopoly. In ZDNET On-Line. Avaialble http//macweek.zdnet.com/1999/10/31/monopoly.html on the fence(p) Resources (1999-06-17), Apache. In Open Resources/The handsome Source On-Line. Available http//www.openresources.com/documents/halloween-1/node10.htmlOSI Open Source Intiative- (2000), Introduction to Open Source. In opensource.org On-Line. Available http//www.opensource.org/intro.htmlSteven, Eric (08/24/2000), cathedral and the Bazaar/Section 1. In duomo and the Bazaar On-Line. Available http//www.tuxedo.org/erythrocyte sedimentation rate/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ Open Source vs Traditional Development Essays -- Essays PapersOpen Source vs Traditional DevelopmentIn the world of technology today there is room for everyone at every level of expertise. From our identified Gurus, to the just bought their first computer newbie. Home computers are sometimes almost to easy to use. The old saying just enough rope to hang yourself comes to mind. Settings that modify the very way the system looks, and runs can be changed with the simple click of the mouse. This power, which has been given to every level of user, is not from training, but from improvements and advancements in the system, and application software on the computer. This software is in a constant state of development, improving on current features and adding new ones.Out of this regular and consistent update in technology have grown many theories and Ideas on how software should be developed and controlled. From corporate America, to college campuses everyone has an idea from one extreme to the other. On one side the belief all software should be free and open to all, and the other protecting software secrets like a rabid guard dog. Of course, both sid es believe the other is a fanatic with a complete lack of sense. The real dividing line is not actually the control and distribution of the software itself, but the blueprint or source code that creates it. That source code is the human readable text that defines what the software does, and looks like. From that a compiler converts it to a form used by the computer know as machine code. In this compiled format it appears to be complete garbage to the average person, even to most people considered to be computer professionals or gurus. Most software--at least on the traditional side--is distributed in its compiled form. The original intent of compiling was not to protect the source code, but this has been one benefit to the software developers. Since a computer can not read the source code, a program is complied to allow it to run on similar type of hardware without the requirement of special software to interpret it into machine code.The traditional and most common form of so urce code control today uses copyrights and the judicial system to protect it. Companies like Microsoft vigilantly protect their vital copyrighted assets by utilizing the court systems any time it feels a threat from an outside source. An alternate form of source code co... ...continue to embrace the OSS movement it will in itself create an industry with more competition, a higher level of standards, and more consumer choice. Closed software has proven to close the market and allow it to be controlled by a single monopoly. The monopolistic technology environment of today has created bloated applications and a complete void of choice for consumers. BibliographyStallman, Richard (1998), Linux and the GNU Project. In Free Software Foundation On-Line. Avaialble http//www.fsf.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html Cooper, Charles (Friday, November 5, 1999), Microsoft judged a monopoly. In ZDNET On-Line. Avaialble http//macweek.zdnet.com/1999/10/31/monopoly.htmlOpen Resources (1999-06-17), Apach e. In Open Resources/The Free Source On-Line. Available http//www.openresources.com/documents/halloween-1/node10.htmlOSI Open Source Intiative- (2000), Introduction to Open Source. In opensource.org On-Line. Available http//www.opensource.org/intro.htmlSteven, Eric (08/24/2000), Cathedral and the Bazaar/Section 1. In Cathedral and the Bazaar On-Line. Available http//www.tuxedo.org/esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/